The Difference Between Regulatory and Market Access Decisions on Treatment Availability for ATMPs Across Australia, EU4, and UK
Author(s)
Fagnocchi G1, Rossi L1, Atkins J2, Balleste Martinez C3, Prada M4
1Intexo SB - ProductLife Group, Rome, RM, Italy, 2Commercial Eyes - ProductLife Group, Melburne, ACT, Australia, 3ProductLife Group, Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 4ProductLife Group - Global, Rome, RM, Italy
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Patient access to ATMPs can be limited due to restrictions set by national or regional health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and/or pricing and reimbursement (P&R decision makers). This research explores variation from regulatory to P&R decisions impacting patient access and time to patients, across Australia, EU4 and UK.
METHODS: HTA and P&R assessments for Australia, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK were obtained for the ATMPs approved in all these countries (Kymriah, Yescarta, Zolgensma, Spinraza, Luxturna). Information was researched on the websites of the Regulatory Agencies in the reference Countries. Key points investigated: level of restriction between the regulatory label population and the time to patient.
RESULTS: The average time to reimbursement for the 5 drugs was 384 (range 70-1897) days. Especially France, Spain, UK and Australia restricted ATMP’s use to specific conditions within the authorized indications (diagnostic procedure, previous therapies, subpopulations) and, in some cases, they even decided not to reimburse some indications; Italy applied strict restrictions on diagnosis or based on previous treatments, while Germany didn’t apply any restrictions. Most European countries reimbursed these drugs based on a performance-based agreement based on registries or post-marketing studies and on re-evaluation after 2 or 5 years, while Australia identified a ceiling and reimbursed only partially the cost of these drugs. Interestingly, it is possible to observe a significant difference in the identification of the therapeutic added value among the countries.
CONCLUSIONS: The significant differences between regulatory and reimbursement decisions in Australia and in various European countries created different dynamics for the access for ATMPs. There is a high variability in the HTA/P&R decision making factors at national level, and often the reasons for discrepancies are not transparent. The joint clinical assessment (JCA) foreseen by the new EU-HTA Regulation might have a beneficial impact on this topic.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
HTA276
Topic
Health Technology Assessment
Topic Subcategory
Decision & Deliberative Processes, Systems & Structure
Disease
Drugs, Oncology, Rare & Orphan Diseases