Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide, Liraglutide and Semaglutide in Patients With Obesity: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of GLP-1 RCTs

Author(s)

Ciudin A1, Sapin H2, Fan L2, Dimitriadis GK3, Zimner-Rapuch S2, Curteis T4, Clark L4, Rubinstein M4, Johansson E5
1Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 3Eli Lilly and Company, London, UK, 4Costello Medical, Manchester, England, UK, 5Eli Lilly and Company, Solna, AB, Sweden

OBJECTIVES: Tirzepatide (5/10/15mg/week), liraglutide (3.0mg/day) and semaglutide (2.4mg/week) demonstrated their respective efficacy and safety versus placebo (adjunct to reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity) in patients with obesity or overweight. No published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compare tirzepatide versus semaglutide or liraglutide, and available indirect comparisons do not exclusively focus on these three treatments. This network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide with semaglutide and liraglutide.

METHODS: Of 42 RCTs identified via a systematic literature review conducted in November 2023, six RCTs (SURMOUNT-1, STEP 1/5/8, O’Neil, SCALE Obesity and Prediabetes), had homogeneous baseline clinical characteristics and were included in a Bayesian random-effects NMA for efficacy (using efficacy estimand [patients remaining on randomized treatment for the study period, per the EMA definition]) and safety.

RESULTS: Versus liraglutide; tirzepatide 5/10/15mg demonstrated statistically improved total weight reduction (WR) (kg) (mean difference [MD]: -8.59/-14.65/-16.06), total WR (%), odds of ≥5% WR (odds ratio: 3.74/11.48/11.82) and ≥10%/≥15%/≥20% WR.

Versus semaglutide; tirzepatide 10/15mg demonstrated statistically improved total WR (kg) (MD: -4.85/-6.26) and odds of ≥20% WR, while total WR (%) and ≥5%/≥10%/≥15% WR showed no statistical differences. Tirzepatide 5 mg showed no statistical differences for most WR outcomes versus semaglutide.

For cardiometabolic outcomes, tirzepatide demonstrated statistically improved waist circumference and triglycerides versus liraglutide, and had similar lipids (HDL/LDL/total cholesterol), glycemic parameters (HbA1c/FPG) and blood pressure (SBP/DBP). Tirzepatide demonstrated comparable results in these cardiometabolic outcomes to semaglutide.

Tirzepatide had similar odds of safety outcomes (nausea/discontinuations/gastrointestinal AEs) to semaglutide and liraglutide.

CONCLUSIONS: All tirzepatide doses demonstrated statistically improved WR outcomes versus liraglutide; and similar or statistically improved WR outcomes versus semaglutide. Tirzepatide demonstrated a similar safety profile to liraglutide and semaglutide, and comparable or improved cardiometabolic outcomes. These NMA results suggest that tirzepatide is a strong alternative treatment for patients with obesity or overweight.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

CO133

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×