No Demand-Side Policies, No Expenditure Savings

Author(s)

Song Y1, Choi E2, Han H2, Sim J1, Kim YH1, Shin G1, Han E3, Bae S1
1Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), 2Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 41, South Korea, 3Yonsei University, Incheon, Korea, Republic of (South)

OBJECTIVES: To control pharmaceutical expenditure, various demand- and supply-side policies are frequently implemented. We sought to compare and interpret biologics market dynamics of the policy context within 12 countries.

METHODS: This study analyzed the trends of the originators’ price (in Fisher index) and overall expenditures (in relative value) for four biologics (Etanercept, Infliximab, Rituximab, and Trastuzumab), and compared their compound quarterly growth rates (CQGRs) using IQVIA-MIDAS® database. Setting the biosimilars’ entry point as a reference (0Q), descriptive analysis was performed across 12 high-income countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK) from -4Q (4Q before biosimilar entry) to Q2 2020. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to investigate each country’s supply-side (including price-link policy) and demand-side policies (including financial incentives).

RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the introduction of biosimilars was associated with the reduction in the originator price indices and relative overall expenditures in most countries, yielding average CQGRs of -1.78% and -1.08%, respectively. The CQGRs for the originator Fisher price indices and relative overall expenditure revealed significant variation across countries, ranging from -7.53% (Australia) to 0.11% (Canada) and from -6.72% (Australia) to 1.28% (Canada), respectively. Korea uniquely showed a significant expenditure rebound following the biosimilar introduction. Interestingly, the seven countries (Australia, Austria, France, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Switzerland) experiencing the greatest price reductions had all implemented price-link policies. The decrease in total expenditure was observed among five countries with aggressive demand-side measures. The other two countries without or with negligible demand-side policies, displayed different outcomes from each other: Japan achieved an indirect reduction in expenditures through stringent price-link policies, whereas Korea where price-link policies are not as activated showed a remarkable expenditure rebound.

CONCLUSIONS: A price-link policy without demand-side measures may not effectively reduce overall expenditures. Further studies are needed to generalize our findings.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

HPR200

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Pricing Policy & Schemes, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Biologics & Biosimilars, Gastrointestinal Disorders, Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal), Oncology, Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×