Model-Projected Clinical Outcomes of Exagamglogene Autotemcel (exa-cel) in Patients With Transfusion-Dependent Beta-Thalassemia in Canada

Author(s)

Udeze C1, Gargano M1, Kaindl L2, Kane S2, Zhou A2, Jain S1, Lopez A1
1Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA, 2Eversana, Burlington, ON, Canada

OBJECTIVES: Exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) is an autologous gene edited therapy with the potential to provide a functional cure for patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT). In Canada, standard of care (SOC) for TDT includes regular red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) and iron chelation therapy. A model was developed to project survival and long-term clinical outcomes of exa-cel versus SOC in Canada for patients with TDT.

METHODS: A Markov model driven by transfusion status was developed to project survival and clinical outcomes over a lifetime. The modeled population was 21.1 years old with 17.2 RBCTs/year; approximately 91% of patients treated with exa-cel were assumed to achieve transfusion independence (TI); the remaining 9% experienced reductions in RBCTs, based on the pre-specified interim analysis of the CLIMB THAL-111 Phase 3 trial in patients ages 12 years and older published in Locatelli et al. 2024 N Engl J Med (data as of January 2023). Patients who reached TI were assumed to have no additional complications beyond those present at baseline. Patients receiving SOC were assumed to remain transfusion dependent throughout their lifetime. Complication risks and mortality inputs were derived from published literature. Modeled outcomes included projected survival, RBCT frequency, and proportion of patients developing complications.

RESULTS: In Canada, exa-cel was projected to increase survival by 18.7 years compared to SOC (mean age at death: 68.0 vs 49.3). Compared to SOC, patients treated with exa-cel received 459.8 fewer RBCTs over a lifetime (24.7 vs 484.5). Additionally, exa-cel lowered the proportion of patients with complications over a lifetime compared to SOC, including hypogonadism (12.76% vs 67.52%), diabetes (10.06% vs 47.36%), osteoporosis (13.69% vs 44.31%), and cardiac complications (6.57% vs 27.72%).

CONCLUSIONS: Model projections suggest exa-cel could substantially improve survival, lower the prevalence of TDT-related complications, and reduce disease burden in patients with TDT in Canada compared to treatment with SOC.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

EE383

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Rare & Orphan Diseases, Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×