Cost-Consequences Analysis (CCA) of Virtual Reality and Robotic Rehabilitation Devices Integrated With a Home-Automation System for Patients With Neurological Diseases: Technology Developed at Hosmartai (Horizon 2020 Funded)

Author(s)

Chatzikou M1, Pregnolato G2, Federico S2, Kiper P2, Regazzetti M2, Latsou D3, Dalpozzo E2
1Pharmecons Easy Access LtD, Rafina, UK, 2San Camillo IRCCS Research Neurorehabilitation Hospital, Venice, Italy, 3Pharmecons Easy Access LtD, York, UK

OBJECTIVES: The recovery of motor function is a primary goal for individuals diagnosed with neurological disease, such as Stroke, Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis. Various rehabilitation methods have been used in neurorehabilitation hospital, including conventional training and those involving technological devices. In addition to rehabilitation devices, such as robotic-assisted and virtual reality systems, the integration of home automation system may play a crucial role in monitoring and recording patient movements. The study evaluated the economic and clinical performance of motor neurorehabilitation technologies by integrating virtual reality and robotic rehabilitation devices with a home-automation system for group therapy (2-3 patients:1 physiotherapist) in comparison to individual rehab services (1 patient:1 physiotherapist)

METHODS: A micro-costing analysis, based on costs of the Italian healthcare system, was performed to identify the costs of development of the new AI technology and a productivity analysis in terms of eligible patients treated of 1:1 ratio (1 patient:1 physiotherapist ratio) as it is the current status in comparison to (2-3 patients:1 physiotherapist) with the new AI technology.

RESULTS: The new technology seems to be a cost-saving option in the 1 physiotherapist – 2 and 3 patients ratio, since it improves both productivity and provides economies of scale. More specifically, the per patient Ratio 1 cost €84,62, the Ratio 2 €64,57 and the Ratio 3 €57,33 per session versus the currently used technology of €74,89. Almost in all cases, HosmartAI technology is a cost-saving option with greater clinical results in all clinical parameters (motor and functional) as well as in patients’ quality of life and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS: AI could automate parts of the process providing improved accuracy, with less human resources, resulting in savings for the healthcare systems.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

MT21

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

Medical Devices, Mental Health (including addition)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×