Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of Respiratory Biologics: Highlighting the Differences in Value Assessment of Asthma Interventions Globally

Author(s)

Ahmed W1, Heffernan K2, Lembo P3, Carlson J4, Dimodica L5
1GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK, 2GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, NA, UK, 3Clarivate Analytics, London, UK, 4Clarivate Analytics, London, NA, UK, 5Clarivate Analytics, Boston, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: This landscape assessment aimed to evaluate and highlight differences in the value placed on clinical and economic evidence provided to HTA bodies, used to gain reimbursement.

METHODS: Data from HTA decisions published 2009–2024 were extracted for the following agencies: IQWiG/G-BA (Germany), NICE (England), SMC (Scotland), HAS (France), AIFA (Italy), AEMPS (Spain), TLV (Sweden), CADTH (Canada), PBAC (Australia), HIRA (South Korea), NHSA (China), CHUIKYO (Japan). Analysis primarily focussed on the clinical data evaluated by these HTA bodies and the final reimbursement decision.

RESULTS: The main clinical decision drivers (CDDs) of reduction in asthma exacerbations and corticosteroid use were highly rated across most HTA bodies; however, AEMPS, AIFA, G-BA, HIRA, NICE and SMC considered quality of life (QoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) improvements to be key CDDs. Lung function improvement, based on FEV1 and FeNO score, was a secondary CDD, considered by AEMPS, CADTH, HIRA, CHUIKYO, NHSA, TLV and SMC. Acceptable safety profile was considered key by HAS, PBAC, CHUIKYO and TLV; hospitalization rate and asthma symptom control were considered supporting CDDs by CADTH and HAS.

By drug, clinical value by demonstrating a reduction in exacerbations was high for all biologics, and in steroid use for mepolizumab, benralizumab and tezepelumab. Clinical value of improved lung function was high for reslizumab and tezepelumab, and QoL and PRO improvements for benralizumab, dupilumab and tezepelumab.

By country, key CDDs were reduction in oral corticosteroid use in all markets; asthma exacerbation rate in all markets except Germany; and improved QoL in all markets except France, Sweden, Canada, Australia and China.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that the most valued CDDs across most HTAs were reductions in asthma exacerbations and corticosteroid use, with some HTAs also prioritizing QoL and PROs. These results can guide evidence-generation strategies, aiding in reimbursement and optimizing outcomes for biologics in asthma.

Funding: GSK (GSK ID 222239)

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

HTA155

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×