Quality of Life Impact of Adverse Events Associated With Systemic Therapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated With Standard Therapies and Biologics Across 13 Countries in Europe, North America, and Asia
Author(s)
Paly V1, García Alfonso P2, Chong G3, Yoshino T4, Krauss J5, Shergill A6, Elliott J7, Krotneva S8, Proskorovsky I9, Hernandez LG7
1Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Fundación ECO. Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 3Olivia Newton-John Cancer & Wellness Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia, 4National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, 5The University of Michigan Health Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 6University of Chicago, Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, IL, USA, 7Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA, 8Evidera, Toronto, ON, Canada, 9Evidera, a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madrid, Spain
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Quality of life (QoL) is an important treatment goal alongside increasing survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We estimated the QoL impact of adverse events (AE) associated with fruquintinib, trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T), regorafenib, and T/T+bevacizumab (T/T+bev) for mCRC previously treated with standard therapies and biologics.
METHODS: EuroQoL-5-Dimension-5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) patient-level data (assessing mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) from the phase 3 randomized clinical trial (Ph3 RCT) FRESCO-2 comparing fruquintinib + best supportive care (BSC) vs. placebo+BSC were analyzed using utility value sets from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, UK, and USA. Multiple univariate and multivariate mixed-effects, repeated-measures, linear regression models were conducted with random intercept for each patient, fixed predictors (randomized treatment, baseline age, sex, baseline utility, prior treatment) and time-variant health state covariates (progression status, ongoing AEs grade ≥3). Grade ≥3 AE rates were from Ph3 RCTs FRESCO and FRESCO-2 for fruquintinib (61.2% and 63.0%), RECOURSE and SUNLIGHT for T/T (69.0% and 69.5%), SUNLIGHT for T/T+bev (72.4%), and CORRECT for regorafenib (78.0%). If statistically significant in the final multivariate model, the ongoing AEs grade ≥3 coefficient was multiplied by the rate of AEs grade ≥3 of each comparator to estimate their AE-associated utility decrement.
RESULTS: No fixed predictor reached statistical significance, including randomized treatment. Progression and ongoing AEs grade ≥3 were statistically significant (p<0.0001); for illustration, 0.0448 and 0.1041 in Spain, respectively. AEs utility decrement was 0.064 and 0.066 for fruquintinib (FRESCO and FRESCO-2); 0.072 (both RECOURSE and SUNLIGHT); 0.075 for T/T+bev; and 0.081 for regorafenib. Results were similar across countries.
CONCLUSIONS: AE-associated utility decrement was double that of disease progression, highlighting the significant impact of AEs on QoL. Fruquintinib was associated with lower AE-associated QoL decrement versus regorafenib, T/T and T/T+bev for patients with mCRC previously treated with standard therapies and biologics.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
PCR71
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Gastrointestinal Disorders, Oncology