Real-World Outcomes for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma With Daratumumab: A Systematic Literature Review

Author(s)

Gros Otero B1, Gungor G2, Gruppe TL3, Wan M4, Jenkins C5, Helme K4
1Janssen-Cilag Spain, MADRID, M, Spain, 2Janssen-Cilag Turkey, Beykoz/İstanbul, Turkey, 3Janssen-Cilag Germany, Neuss, Germany, 4Janssen-Cilag Limited UK, High Wycombe, UK, 5Rocket Science Medical Communications, Wantage, UK

OBJECTIVES:

To characterize real-world outcomes of daratumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

METHODS:

A systematic literature review was conducted of publications from January 2015 to May 2020 in Embase, PubMed, and American Society of Hematology and European Hematology Association conference abstracts. Eligibility criteria included daratumumab-approved regimens in MM, ≥20 patients, and written in English. Publications reporting efficacy, safety, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), quality of life (QoL), or cost-effectiveness were considered.

RESULTS:

Overall, 43 publications were identified that reported real-world studies with daratumumab in MM, 42 in the RRMM setting (n=4,538) and 1 in front-line that evaluated daratumumab+bortezomib+melphalan+prednisone. Of the publications on RRMM, 16 reported data on daratumumab monotherapy, 7 on daratumumab+lenalidomide+dexamethasone (D-Rd), 7 on daratumumab+bortezomib+dexamethasone (D-Vd), 4 on daratumumab+pomalidomide+dexamethasone (D-Pd), and 14 as part of a pooled therapy (some publications reported >1 daratumumab regimen). In total, 37 publications reported efficacy, 20 reported safety, 3 reported cost-effectiveness data, and none reported PROs or QoL. Patient populations included those with high clinical unmet need such as those who were lenalidomide-refractory (n=650) or immunomodulatory drug-refractory (n=612), had previous stem cell transplantation (n=732), high-risk cytogenetics (n=86), or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 (n=120) or 3 (n=18). Despite shorter follow-up, survival results and safety profile were generally consistent with data from randomized controlled trials. Best median progression-free survival was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4─12.5; median follow-up 11.7 months, n=107) with daratumumab monotherapy, 26.6 months (95% CI, 20.7─62.8; median follow-up 11.8 months, n=263) with D-Rd, 11.5 months (95% CI, 2.76─not evaluable; follow-up not reported, n=23) with D-Vd, and 25.0 months (95% CI, 5.0─not evaluable; median follow-up 29.0 months, n=86) with D-Pd.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings confirm and provide certainty that in a real-world setting, daratumumab is effective across different patient populations with RRMM regardless of patient disease characteristics or clinical features.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

SA58

Topic

Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×