Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Introducing Ceftazidime-Avibactam to Treatment Strategies for Hospital-Acquired Infections in Greece

Author(s)

Barmpouni M1, Grammelis V2, Rousakis A2, Miller R3, Pritchard C3, Dennis J3, Al Taie A4
1Pfizer Hellas, Athens, A1, Greece, 2Pfizer Hellas, Athens, Greece, 3Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK, 4Pfizer R&D UK Limited, Tadworth, UK

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a significant and growing health crisis, especially in Greece, where rates are among the highest in Europe. Ceftazidime-avibactam has been approved in Europe to treat a broad range of gram-negative bacterial infections, including complicated intra-abdominal, complicated urinary tract infections, and hospital-acquired pneumonia, which pose an increasing threat to public health. This cost-effectiveness analysis aimed at evaluating ceftazidime-avibactam in the management of gram-negative hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in Greece.

METHODS:

The cost-effectiveness analysis of ceftazidime-avibactam was adapted to the Greek setting from a previously published dynamic transmission model of AMR. The model considered HAIs due to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The base case analysis included ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem as a first-line treatment in a two-line, indication-specific, treatment strategy. Two alternative scenarios evaluated ceftazidime-avibactam against meropenem-vaborbactam and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam as first-line treatments based on their licensed indications. Inputs for incidence, efficacy, resistance, adverse events, and costs were sourced from the literature and expert opinion. A ten-year infection transmission horizon was considered, where quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated over a lifetime, using a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000–€35,000 per QALY. Costs and QALYs were discounted at a rate of 3.5%.

RESULTS:

The base-case considered 27,508 modelled annual infections, over 10 years. The intervention strategy including ceftazidime-avibactam had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €471.16 per QALY. Ceftazidime-avibactam was associated with an additional 456,062 QALYs, at an incremental cost of €214,879,039, with drug costs being partially offset by savings in hospitalisation and adverse event costs. Ceftazidime-avibactam was dominant in both scenarios where comparator arms used meropenem-vaborbactam and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam as the first-line treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated considerable cost-effectiveness against comparators for treating gram-negative HAIs, in Greece. As the value of new antimicrobials extend beyond those captured within this model, future methods should seek to estimate this additional value.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE452

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Novel & Social Elements of Value

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×