The Value of Real-World Evidence (RWE) in Melanoma in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Appraisals

Author(s)

Shah R1, Gautam R2, Rai MK1, Prasanna R3
1EVERSANA, Mumbai, MH, India, 2EVERSANA, Mumbai, India, 3EVERSANA, Singapore, Singapore

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

Increasingly real-world evidence (RWE) is also appraised to support the value of new health technologies that ensures timely patient access. RWE is considered as evidence gathered outside of RCTs and derived from data obtained from non-randomized trials, observational studies, or databases amongst others. This analysis aims to assess the value of RWE in recent HTA appraisals for melanoma drugs in England, France, Canada, Australia, Germany, Scotland, and the Netherlands.

METHODS:

All publicly available appraisal reports from the NICE,UK; HAS, France; CADTH/pCODR(Canada), PBAC, Australia; IQWiG, Germany; SMC, Scotland; ZIN, Netherlands; between 1st January 2011 and 30th June, 2022 for melanoma drugs were identified, from which RWE and reimbursement outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS:

Eighty melanoma health technologies appraisal reports were assessed, of which RWE was submitted in 27 reports (33.75%); specifically, 11/15 of NICE appraisals, 2/10 of PBAC, 5/15 of pCODR, 0/5 of HAS, 0/15 of IQWIG, 9/17 of SMC, and 0/3 of ZIN. RWE from registry data (19 studies), observational studies (6 studies), retrospective analyses (1 study) , or databases (4 studies), was submitted to identify treatment patterns and patient characteristics, and as supportive evidence for the economic evaluation, such as long-term survival data extrapolation and validation of economic model inputs. Where clinical efficacy data was submitted on single-arm study, RWE was submitted to reduce uncertainty. NICE, PBAC, SMC, and PBAC has cited RWE use for drug effectiveness while the ZIN and IQWiG have cited RWE for evidence on prevalence. The melanoma technologies assessed were nivolumab, dabrafenib/trametinib, encorafenib /binimetinib, pembrolizumab, talimogene laherparepvec, ipilimumab, dabrafenib, cobimetinib/vemurafenib, vemurafenib, amongst others.

CONCLUSIONS:

RWE adds value to HTA appraisals particularly by supporting economic evaluation such as long-term survival extrapolation assumptions, to identify treatment patterns and patient characteristics. This allows expedited access of technologies in areas of high unmet clinical need through managed access schemes.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

HTA110

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Distributed Data & Research Networks, Systems & Structure

Disease

SDC: Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×