An Evaluation of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Requirements for Emerging Therapies in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

Author(s)

Hartl K1, Şahbaz Gülser S2, Spoorendonk JA2, Jose R2
1OPEN Health, Berlin, BE, Germany, 2OPEN Health, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The reimbursement landscape of available AD drugs is heterogeneous across countries, and challenges are associated with reimbursement decision-making. With several new agents currently in phase III clinical development, there is a need to understand HTA and payer evidence requirements in this disease area.

OBJECTIVES: To provide recommendations for HTA requirements in AD from a market access and health economics perspective based on previous assessments by HAS, IQWiG, and NICE.

METHODS: We searched the websites of HAS, IQWiG and NICE for assessments of currently available AD treatments. Then we mapped the identified requirements from the HTA reports with endpoints used in clinical trials of emerging therapies (identified through clinicaltrials.gov), namely aducanumab, donanemab, gantenerumab, and lecanemab. These interventions were included in our evaluation as they may be considered for future marketing authorisation.

RESULTS: Out of 31 HTA reports identified, we included only the most recent assessments (n=11) as these represent the current reimbursement landscape. From clinicaltrials.gov, we included 18 phase III clinical trials.

Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine are reimbursed in Germany, England, and Wales but not in France. Cognition, daily function, behaviour, global clinical assessment, time to institutionalisation, mortality, adverse events, HRQoL, and caregiver burden were the most common endpoints used for decision-making across HTAs. However, for institutionalisation, caregiver burden, and HRQoL, the evidence provided in the submissions was deemed inadequate. Moreover, a common critique across HTAs was small evaluable sample sizes and a lack of long-term data.

The primary endpoints of the identified clinical trials were cognition, disease-specific functioning scales, and safety. None of the assessed trials included endpoints on HRQoL, caregiver burden, or institutionalisation.

CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical trials on new AD agents include HTA- and payer-relevant endpoints, it is highly recommended to also assess time to institutionalisation, HRQoL, and caregiver burden to generate a compelling HTA and payer evidence package.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

HTA15

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

SDC: Mental Health (including addition), STA: Drugs

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×