A Chart Review Study of Dry Eye Disease Symptoms and Treatment Patterns Among Patients Receiving Lifitegrast in the United States and Canada
Author(s)
Syntosi A1, Salzger MP1, Castriota F2, Nguyen C2, Huynh L3, Sloesen B4
1Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 2Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA, 3Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 4Novartis Pharma AG, Vilvoorde, VBR, Belgium
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate dry eye disease (DED) symptoms and treatment patterns among patients receiving lifitegrast in the United States (US) and Canada. METHODS: This study included 600 adult patients diagnosed with DED who initiated treatment with lifitegrast ophthalmic solution (index date) on or after 01/01/2017 (US) (550 patients [91.7%]) and 01/01/2018 (Canada) (50 patients [8.3%]). Demographics, treatments, and clinical characteristics were assessed during the 6-month pre-index period and post-index period, defined as time from index date to last known follow-up. RESULTS: Patients were followed for mean (standard deviation [SD]) 12.3 (5.7) months post-index. Mean (SD) time from DED diagnosis to first lifitegrast prescription was 23.3 (42.7) months. Of the 524 (87.3%) patients remaining on treatment at end of follow-up, mean (SD) treatment duration [by index year] was 28.5 (10.6) months [2017], 15.9 (5.2) months [2018], and 8.8 (2.6) months [2019]. Fewer patients experienced symptoms or used other DED-related therapies after initiating lifitegrast. Pre-index vs. 6-months post-index (n=570), 525 (87.5%) vs. 37 (6.5%) patients experienced eye dryness, 346 (57.7%) vs. 26 (4.6%) blurred vision, 336 (56.0%) vs. 17 (3.0%) ocular burning/stinging, 299 (49.8%) vs. 9 (1.6%) foreign body sensation, and 73 (12.2%) vs. 3 (0.5%) ocular pain. Quality of life symptoms such as fatigue, depression, and headache were reported among 82 (13.7%) vs. 0 (0.0%), 55 (9.2%) vs. 6 (1.1%), and 19 (3.2%) vs. 1 (0.2%) patients, respectively. Pre-index vs. post-index combined with lifitegrast, 453 (75.5%) vs. 271 (45.2%) patients used over-the-counter artificial tears; regarding prescription therapies, 115 (19.2%) vs. 11 (1.8%) used cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, 113 (18.8%) vs. 23 (3.8%) topical corticosteroids, and 20 (3.3%) vs. 8 (1.3%) autologous serum tears. 226 (37.7%) patients had lifitegrast monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients had improved DED symptoms and quality of life related symptoms, and they had reduced use of concomitant treatments following lifitegrast initiation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PDG8
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Disease Management, Prescribing Behavior, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Disease
Drugs