MODEL-Based LONG-TERM Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Compared with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review

Author(s)

Zhen R1, Shi H2, Yang L3, Hu H4
1Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, 11, China, 2University of Macau, Macao, China, 3University of Macau, Macao SAR, 92, China, 4University of Macau, Callaghan, Australia

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the existing pharmacoeconomic literatures evaluating the long-term cost effectiveness associated with once-weekly semaglutide in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic literature review up to 1st Apr 2020 in PubMed, web of science, and the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) presentation database was conducted. All long-term cost-effectiveness studies assessing once-weekly semaglutide comparing with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were included.

RESULTS

A total of ten studies were identified, including eight studies based on the IQVIA Core diabetes model and two studies based on the Swedish Institute for Health Economics Cohort Model of T2D (IHE model). Results showed that once-weekly semaglutide reduced cumulative incidence and delayed time to onset of diabetes-related complications than all comparators, resulting in improvement of quality-adjusted life expectancy, and saving of complication cost over patient lifetime horizon. When comparing with dulaglutide, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5mg and 1.0mg were associated with a range of 0.02~0.11 QALYs gained and 0.05~0.34 QALYs gained, respectively. The total cost of once-weekly semaglutide was projected to be lower than dulaglutide in most of the studies. When comparing with exenatide extended-release, lixisenatide and liraglutide, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5mg and 1.0mg were associated with a range of 0.14~0.39 QALYs gained and 0.13~0.71 QALYs gained, respectively. The total cost of once-weekly semaglutide was projected to be lower or slightly higher, which varied from comparators. Results based on the IQVIA Core diabetes model and IHE model were similar. The treatment algorithm and criteria for treatment change assumed in the model simulation would be more important for the long-term projection than the economic model used.

CONCLUSIONS :

The current literature presents that compared with dulaglutide and other GLP-1 RAs, once-weekly semaglutide was considered dominated or highly cost-effectiveness treatment alternative for type 2 diabetes.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PDB28

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×