Comparative Clinical Effectiveness of Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Author(s)
Nikitin D1, Lin G2, McKenna A3, Herron-Smith S3, Campbell J3, Agboola FO3
1Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Highland Park, NJ, USA, 2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative clinical effectiveness of five monoclonal antibodies (natalizumab, ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, rituximab, ublituximab) as first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS); and to compare these treatments to placebo and oral DMTs (dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, ozanimod, ponesimod, and teriflunomide).
METHODS: We systematically identified and reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least one-year duration conducted in adults with relapsing forms of MS. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) for the outcomes of annualized relapse rate (ARR) and time to 3-month and 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP-3/6). Uncertainties were explored with sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS: After a review of 7,100 references, we identified 20 relevant RCTs that met our inclusion criteria, with an additional two RCTs utilized as connecting nodes in the NMA. Monoclonal antibody DMTs were all statistically superior to placebo with an estimated reduction in ARR of ~70% (relative risk range: 0.29 to 0.34). The monoclonal antibodies were generally superior to the oral agents, although the magnitude of the relative differences and statistical significance varied. No statistically significant difference in ARR reduction was observed between the monoclonal antibodies. A similar trend was observed for the CDP- 3 and CDP-6 outcomes; however, there was greater uncertainty in the estimates. Among the monoclonal antibodies, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab were associated with a reduced risk of CDP-6 versus placebo (hazard ratio range: 0.41 to 0.54). The results of the NMAs were robust to sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Monoclonal antibodies provide substantial benefit relative to placebo for relapses of MS and may provide incremental benefit over the oral agents. The benefits of treatment on CDP-3/6 are less certain. There is insufficient evidence to establish whether there are differences in clinical effectiveness amongst the monoclonal antibodies.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
CO63
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas