Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Treatment with Vimseltinib for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumour in a Phase 2 Expansion Study
Author(s)
Blay JY1, Gelderblom H2, Rutkowski P3, Wagner AJ4, van de Sande M5, Stacchiotti S6, Le Cesne A7, Palmerini E8, Vallee M9, Harrow B10, Becker C11, Jarecha R9, Sharma M9, Tap WD12
1Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, 2Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Maria Skodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland, 4Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA, 5Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands, 6Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy, 7Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, 8IRCCS Instituto Ortopedico RIzzoli, Bologna, Italy, 9Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA, 10Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Burlington, MA, USA, 11Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, belmont, MA, USA, 12Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm caused by upregulation of the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) gene. Vimseltinib is an oral switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically designed to selectively and potently inhibit CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) and was well tolerated by patients in a phase 1/2 study. Here, we evaluate patient-reported outcome measures for patients with TGCT treated with the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of vimseltinib (30 mg twice weekly; NCT03069469).
METHODS: Patients with TGCT not amenable to surgery were treated in 2 cohorts: A (no prior anti-CSF1/CSF1R therapy except imatinib and/or nilotinib) and B (prior anti-CSF1/CSF1R therapy). Pain was evaluated using the brief pain inventory; swelling and stiffness at the site of the tumour were assessed with symptom-specific questions on the numeric rating scale (scale from 0–10 with 0 being none and 10 being worst imaginable). Results at Week 25 are reported.
RESULTS: As of Feb 18, 2022, 57 patients were enrolled: 46 in A (enrollment complete) and 11 in B (enrollment ongoing). In cohort A, 22/46 (48%) and 24/46 (52%) patients had ≥30% improvement in worst and average pain, respectively. In cohort B, 6/9 (67%) patients had ≥30% improvement in both worst and average pain. At baseline, the average score was 5.1 for both swelling and stiffness in cohort A; swelling decreased by 2.5 points and stiffness decreased by 2.0 points. In cohort B, the average baseline scores for swelling and stiffness were 4.0 and 5.0, respectively; swelling decreased by 2.4 points and stiffness decreased by 2.7 points.
CONCLUSIONS: At the RP2D of vimseltinib, patients in both cohorts reported improvement in worst and average pain and joint swelling and stiffness at Week 25. Results support continued evaluation of vimseltinib at this dose level in the ongoing phase 3 MOTION trial (NCT05059262).
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Acceptance Code
P63
Topic
Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Trials, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
sdc-oncology