Psychometric Validation of the PROMIS Fatigue-Short Form 7A in Adults with Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) Lung Disease: The ARISE and ENCORE Studies

Author(s)

Mange KC1, Serrano D2, Hassan M1, Nevoret ML1, Yuen DW1, Ciesielska M1, McManus S3, Podger L3, Barnes B3, Daley C4
1Insmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, USA, 2The Psychometrics Team, Sheridan, WY, USA, 3OPEN Health Group, Bethesda, MD, USA, 4National Jewish Health and the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate psychometric properties of the patient-reported PROMIS Fatigue-Short Form 7a (PROMIS F-SF 7a) in adults with newly diagnosed or recurrent MAC lung disease (MAC-LD).

METHODS: Data analyzed were from ARISE (NCT04677543; baseline and longitudinal data) and ENCORE (NCT04677569; baseline data) double-blind, randomized, active-control trials assessing impact of once-daily amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) treatment on fatigue symptoms in MAC-LD. In ARISE, treatment was administered for 6 months, followed by 1 month off treatment. Modern psychometric methods (MPMs) were employed to test item properties and establish an empirical scoring algorithm. Classical measurement properties evaluated included reliability (internal consistency, test-retest reliability [TRTR]), convergent and known-groups validity, and responsiveness (meaningful within-patient change [MWPC]). MPMs, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), convergent validity (Pearson correlations), and known-groups validity were analyzed at baseline (N=230 patients [ARISE: n=98, ENCORE: n=132]). Convergent validity was assessed between PROMIS F-SF 7a and the EXACT tool, E-RS scale, SGRQ, and FACIT-Fatigue. Known-groups validity compared PROMIS F-SF 7a scores across PGI-S Fatigue groups. TRTR was estimated via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC[A,1]) among patients reporting no change in PGI-S Fatigue between screening and baseline. Anchor-based MWPC thresholds were estimated between baseline and end of study (month 7) and supplemented with empirical cumulative distribution curves (N=99 patients from ARISE).

RESULTS: MPMs supported relevance of all items and a sum score for the PROMIS F-SF 7a. The PROMIS F-SF 7a demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.83–0.89), TRTR (ICC[A,1]: 0.76), and convergent validity (EXACT: 0.56, E-RS: 0.52, SGRQ: 0.66, FACIT-Fatigue: -0.80). Known-groups validity was demonstrated across PGI-S Fatigue groups. MWPC analyses supported a -4.00-point change from baseline as a proposed clinically meaningful within-patient improvement.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate the PROMIS F-SF 7a has adequate reliability, validity, and responsiveness for assessing fatigue symptoms in adults with newly diagnosed or recurrent MAC-LD.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

PCR196

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation

Disease

Rare & Orphan Diseases, Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×