Ribociclib Versus CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Endocrine Therapies (ET) for First Line (1L), Metastatic or Advanced HR+ HER2- Pre- and Post-Menopausal Breast Cancer in Asia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Author(s)
Yin Y1, Liang Y1, Sun C1, Yang F1, Li C2, Yu J2, Sun R2, Mondal S3, Tai TA4, Ting B5
1Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, 2Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai, China, 3Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India, 4Novartis Global Service Centre, Dublin, Ireland, 5Novartis Corporate Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Currently, three CDK 4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib, palbociclib, and dalpiciclib approved in China for breast cancer. The objective was to compare ribociclib versus CDK4/6 inhibitors and ET in patients with the 1L pre/post-menopausal HR+/HER2-metastatic/advanced breast cancer patients in Asia.
METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using key English and Chinese literature databases from 2007 till September 2022. Data reported on Asia population was extracted and considered for Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA), comparing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials included in SLR contributed to NMA for both post-menopausal (n=7) and pre-menopausal (n=2) inclusively. In post-menopausal, PFS data was available for CDK4/6 inhibitors, but OS was reported only for abemaciclib and ribociclib in the Asia subgroup. Limited data were reported for Asia subgroup in pre-menopausal patients; no trial was identified for palbociclib and abemaciclib, while dalpiciclib trial reported only PFS. In post-menopausal patients, significant PFS benefit was observed with ribociclib plus aromatase inhibitors (AI) compared to AI (HR: 0.26 [0.13, 0.52]), fulvestrant (HR: 0.33 [0.13, 0.81]), and palbociclib plus AI (HR: 0.41 [0.20, 0.83]) whereas results were numerically favouring ribociclib plus AI against dalpiciclib plus AI (HR: 0.51 [0.24, 1.08]) and abemaciclib plus AI (HR: 0.72 [0.34,1.52]). Favorable OS was associated with ribociclib plus AI versus AI alone (HR: 0.64 [0.35,1.17]), while results were comparable against abemaciclib plus AI (HR: 1.01 [0.45, 2.24]). In pre-menopausal patients, PFS was significantly better with ribociclib plus ET versus ET (HR: 0.42 [0.27, 0.66]) and numerically better compared to dalpiciclib plus ET (HR: 0.79 [0.41,1.52]).
CONCLUSIONS: Ribociclib was associated with significant PFS benefit against palbociclib in post-menopausal patients and was comparable or numerically better against other CDK4/6 inhibitors (abemaciclib and dalpiciclib) among pre-/post-menopausal patients. Furthermore, ribociclib has proven OS benefits in 1L pre-/post-menopausal patients.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
CO164
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas