Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax+Rituximab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Author(s)

Monica M1, Reczek M2, Kawalec P3
1Doctoral School of Medical and Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, MA, Poland, 2HTA Consulting, Cracow, Poland, 3Jagiellonian University Medical College Institute of Public Health, Kraków, Poland

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

Venetoclax+rituximab (VEN+RTX) is a potent anti-leukemic therapy for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL), superior to bendamustine+rituximab (BEND+RTX) based on the results of the MURANO trial. However, the relative efficacy and safety of VEN+RTX compared to other treatment options remain unknown. This study aimed to compare VEN+RTX with other possible therapies for R/R CLL, including BTK and PI3K inhibitors, chemotherapy, and/or immunotherapy.

METHODS:

An extensive systematic review was performed in medical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library) and other sources to identify randomized clinical trials for R/R CLL (PROSPERO: CRD42022304330). Data for the longest available follow-up from identified studies were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and serious adverse events (SAEs) in Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). The results of NMA were presented as hazard ratios (HR) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI); SUCRA values were also calculated. Statistical analyses were performed in the R software using the GeMTC package.

RESULTS:

As a result of the systematic search, 15 studies were identified and included in the NMA. VEN+RTX significantly prolonged PFS compared to immuno(chemo)therapy (HR [95% CrI] for VEN+RTX vs. RTX: 0.08 [0.04; 0.16], vs. OFA: 0.11 [0.06; 0.20], vs. CLB+RTX: 0.13 [0.08; 0.23], physician's choice: 0.08 [0.04; 0.18]) and regimens based on PI3K inhibitors (HR [95% CrI] for VEN+RTX vs. IDE+OFA: 0.41 [0.20; 0.84], vs. IDE+RTX: 0.28 [0.15; 0.49], vs. IDE+BEND+RTX: 0.58 [0.39; 0.85], DUV: 0.20 [0.10; 0.40]). No significant differences were found in PFS for comparisons with BTK inhibitors (AKA, IBR, ZAN). Overall survival was similar between VEN+RTX and other therapies except for immunotherapy and the physician's choice. Rates of SAE were also significantly decreased compared to PI3Ki regimens.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of NMA suggest that VEN+RTX is superior to all chemoimmunotherapy and PI3K regimens and has similar efficacy to BTK inhibitors in R/R CLL.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

CO112

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Drugs, Rare & Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×