Brigatinib Compared with Crizotinib and Alectinib in Patients with ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Brain Metastases at Diagnosis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Perspective of the Brazilian Private Health Care S ...

Author(s)

Genov I1, Mendes da Silva B1, Lanchoti Fiori GM2, Villas Boas B2, Teixeira Chadid T2, Regis C2
1Takeda Farmacêutica Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2Takeda Farmacêutica Brasil, Sao Paulo, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Second generation ALK-inhibitors have shown improvement in brain disease control compared with Crizotinib in patients with metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. However, Crizotinib is the only treatment covered by the Brazilian private health care system (BHCS) so far. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line Brigatinib in patients with ALK+ NSCLC and brain metastases at diagnosis, in comparison with Crizotinib and Alectinib, according to BHCS perspective. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a Markov model and a 10-year time horizon. Data from three pivotal trials (PROFILE 1014, ALEX and ALTA-1L) informed the efficacy inputs. Resource consumption and utilities were obtained from the literature. Drug costs were taken from the Medicine Market Regulation Chamber (CMED), as published in August 2020, in Brazilian Reais (R$). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for each comparison was calculated from the health insurers’ perspective. A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: This model identified that Brigatinib used as first-line treatment is dominant, in comparison to Crizotinib (ICER: - R$135,547) and Alectinib (ICER: -R$85,046). Sensitivity analyses showed that these results are robust and depend, mainly, on the probability of death for patients treated with Brigatinib. During the sensitive analysis, assuming a probability of death of 0.24 at the end of first year, the upper limit of the confidence interval, results an ICER of -R$600,000. CONCLUSIONS: First line treatment with Brigatinib in patients with ALK+ NSCLC and brain metastases at diagnosis can be cost-effective, according to the BHCS perspective. This can be seen as an opportunity to enhance local health care sustainability, with the potential to improve the prognosis of ALK+ NSCLC even in patients with brain metastases at diagnosis.

This study was funded by Takeda Farmacêutica Brasil.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PCN68

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Insurance Systems & National Health Care, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×