Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Epcoritamab for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma After Two or More Lines of Systemic Therapy in Greece

Author(s)

Tzanetakos C1, Papageorgiou G2, Wang A3, Psarra M1, Gourzoulidis G4
1Health Through Evidence, Athens, Greece, 2AbbVie Hellas, Athens, Greece, 3AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA, 4Health Through Evidence, Athens, A1, Greece

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of epcoritamab compared to available treatment alternatives for treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after at least two lines of systemic therapy in Greece.

METHODS: A partitioned survival model, with three different health states (progression-free survival [PFS], post-progression survival, and death), was locally adapted from a Greek payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Epcoritamab was compared to rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy (R-CIT), polatuzumab vedotin with bendamustine plus rituximab (pola+BR), glofitamab, and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (tafa+len) as well as to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Since the pivotal epcoritamab trial, EPCORE NHL-1, is a single-arm trial, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were employed to generate comparative efficacy evidence against these comparators. Safety and utility data were extracted from the EPCORE-NHL-1 trial and literature. Direct costs pertaining to drug acquisition, administration, monitoring, adverse events, and terminal care were considered in the analysis. All cost inputs were indexed to 2024 euros. Primary outcomes were patients’ quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). All future outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS: Compared to R-CIT, pola+BR, glofitamab, and tafa+len, epcoritamab was found to be more effective (QALY gains: 2.744, 2.799, 0.916, and 1.724, respectively) and cost-effective (ICERs: €41,539, €28,681, €65,600, and dominant, respectively). In patients eligible for CAR-T therapies, epcoritamab was found to be a dominant treatment compared to both axi-cel and tisa-cel (versus axi-cel: less costly by €71,843 and more effective by 0.838 QALYs; versus tisa-cel: less costly by €60,307 and more effective by 2.416 QALYs). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of base-case results.

CONCLUSIONS: Epcoritamab was estimated to be the most effective and cost-effective therapy compared to all other available therapies for patients with R/R DLBCL in the third line treatment setting in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

EE548

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology, Rare & Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×