Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous CELL Carcinoma in Patients Whose Tumor Expressed Programmed Death-Ligand 1 at Combined Positive Score ≥1 in France

Author(s)

Massetti M1, Even C2, Geoffrois L3, Farge G4, Levy Bachelot L4, Borse R5, Chirovsky D5, Durand Zaleski I6
1Public Health Expertise, Paris, 75, France, 2Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, 3Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine-Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France, 4MSD France, Paris, France, 5Merck and Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 6AP-HP / INSERM, Paris, France

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES

:
To estimate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients whose tumor expressed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) at combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 in France.

METHODS

:
A partitioned survival model was developed to predict the lifetime costs and health outcomes of treatment with pembrolizumab either as monotherapy or in combination with platinum+5-FU versus cetuximab+platinum+5-FU (EXTREME regimen). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the KEYNOTE-048 trial were extrapolated over a 10-year time horizon using a piecewise modelling approach based on parametric functions (cut-off points of 52 weeks for PFS and 80 weeks for OS), independently fitted for each treatment arm. Time on treatment for first-line treatment was modelled using the Kaplan-Meier data only. Utilities were derived from KEYNOTE-048 and converted to French population-based utility values using a published algorithm. Only direct medical costs were considered, based on public sources. Results’ uncertainty was explored through sensitivity analyses around the model’s main assumptions.

RESULTS

:
In patients with CPS≥1, pembrolizumab in combination was associated with an incremental gain of +1.18 life-years (LYs) and +0.78 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an extra-cost of €58,962, representing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €75,443/QALY vs. EXTREME. Pembrolizumab monotherapy led to an incremental gain of 0.46 LYs and 0.33 QALYs at an extra-cost of €26,547, resulting in an ICER of 80,736€/QALY vs. EXTREME. Results were most sensitive to survival extrapolations, discount rate and body surface area. The willingness-to-pay threshold should reach €110,000/QALY and €94,000/QALY to have >80% probability of being cost-effective, respectively for pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab in combination vs. EXTREME.

CONCLUSIONS

:
In the first-line treatment of R/M HNSCC patients with PD-L1 expression at CPS≥1, pembrolizumab extends patients’ survival at acceptable ICERs for oncologic treatments in France.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PCN81

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×