Cost-Effectiveness of Alteplase to TREAT ACUTE Ischemic Stroke within 4.5 Hours after Onset in the Brazilian Unified Health System Perspective.
Author(s)
Campos DB1, Martins SO2, Safanelli J3, Santoni NB4, Marcolino M5, Antonini Ribeiro R6
1Boehringer Ingelheim Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 3Joinville Stroke Registry, Joinville, Brazil, 4Boehringer Ingelheim, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 5Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 6HTAnalyze, Porto Alegre, Brazil
OBJECTIVES : To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of thrombolysis with alteplase to treat acute ischemic stroke until 4.5 hours of symptoms initiation compared with clinical treatment without thrombolysis (control) under the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) perspective. METHODS : A four-state Markov model of the primary ischemic stroke treatment was built to predict costs, life-years gained (LYG), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and respective incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) considering a life-time horizon. After the treatment, patients could develop fatal or non-fatal intracranial hemorrhage and would enter three states of disability (modified Rankin scale, mRS 0-1, 2-3, 4-5) or death. Transition to a greater disability/death would occur by recurrent stroke. Effectiveness and safety inputs were obtained in an individual patient-level meta-analysis for treatment until 3 hours and 3-4.5 hours. Acute and chronic costs were obtained in a reanalysis of micro-costing data from a cohort of ischemic Brazilian stroke patients treated in public hospitals. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA, 1000 simulations) were performed. Discount rate of 5% was applied for costs and effectiveness. RESULTS : Treatment with alteplase compared with control resulted in 5.95 vs. 5.73 LYG, 3.59 vs. 3.24 QALY and total costs of R$ 36,606.30 vs. R$ 32,495.75, with ICER of R$18,403.41/LYG and R$11,942.61/QALY. The ICER/LYG was most sensitive to variation in alteplase effectiveness, acute stroke treatment and 90-day mortality. ICER/QALY was most sensitive to alteplase effectiveness, acute and chronic stroke costs, utility of mRS 0-1 state and fatal HIC risk. In PSA, the 95% confidence interval were R$ 11,395.00 to R$ 30,837.47/LYG and R$ 15,450.79 to R$ 16,983.76/QALY, with 70.7% and 93.1% being under a willingness-to-pay threshold of R$ 31,833.50 (2019 gross domestic product per capita of Brazil). CONCLUSIONS : Treatment of acute ischemic stroke with alteplase until 4.5 hours from onset is cost-effective in the perspective of the Brazilian public health system.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PND26
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Public Health
Disease
Neurological Disorders