Conceptualization and Validation of a De Novo Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Interstitial Lung Disease
Speaker(s)
Hopmans Galofré M1, Fernandez Delgado M2, Harper S3, Green W4, Dymond A4, Funes DF1, González-Rojas N1, Palmer S5, Stevenson MD6, Kiely D6, Cannon J7, Price L8
1Grupo Ferrer Internacional, S.A, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 2Grupo Ferrer Internacional, S.A, Barcelona, Spain, 3York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK, 4York Health Economics Consortium, York, Yorkshire, UK, 5University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK, 6University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, England, 7Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK, 8Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, London, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) is a rare and severe disease classified as World Health Organisation PH Group 3. The 16-week INCREASE randomised control trial (NCT02630316) and open-label extension (NCT02633293) evaluated the safety and efficacy of inhaled treprostinil in PH-ILD. No PH-ILD treatments have been appraised by health technology assessment agencies and no published cost-effectiveness analyses are available. We aimed to conceptualise and validate a conceptual model that appropriately captured the progressive nature of PH-ILD and efficacy of inhaled treprostinil.
METHODS: The de-novo model conceptualisation was based on a targeted literature review, consideration of the INCREASE endpoints and external natural history data. The chosen model structure was validated through individual interviews and advisory boards with pulmonologists and health-economic experts.
RESULTS: The use of health states based on disease progression events or severity was considered. Severity was disregarded because no disease staging systems are established in PH-ILD and the WHO Functional Class was not recorded in the INCREASE trial, nor could be inferred from other endpoints. Instead, a cohort partitioned survival model (PSM), incorporating time-to-event data from INCREASE was considered most appropriate. Health states were based on disease progression events representing clinical worsening including death, decreased six-minute walking distance of ≥15% from baseline (to capture PH decline), decreased predicted forced vital capacity of ≥10% from baseline (to capture lung function decline), cardiopulmonary hospitalisation, lung-disease exacerbation and lung transplants. The structure allowed for long-term extrapolation of survival and disease progression using clinically meaningful, PH-ILD-specific events, whilst directly utilising INCREASE endpoints. The PSM approach directly informs health state occupation and avoids the need to specify individual transitions – this will further facilitate validation of the results.
CONCLUSIONS: A cohort PSM using patient-level data from INCREASE to inform survival curves predicting the time to disease progression events and death was considered most appropriate.
Code
EE285
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory)